Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Coe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 29, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 2075-49PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURRAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are owners of an apartment building located on the west side of Sixteenth Street, N.W., between K and L Streets, directly opposite the main entrance to the Statler Hotel, in an area zoned Residential 90’ “D.” The premises are known as 1016 Sixteenth Street, N. W. They desire to convert the apartment building to an office building. Since the property is located in the aforementioned area this conversion cannot be accomplished unless the defendants, members of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, grant an exception for this purpose.
Three appeals for such exception,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Burr v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Robinson v. T.C. of NarragansettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
- Lewis v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Coleman v. Board of Appeal of the Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brawner Building, Inc. v. R. Roderick Shehyn, Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Salsbery v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Kelly Supply Company, Inc. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. ClouserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.