Legal Opinion

People v. Blankenship

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 2004No. 3-02-0937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Defendant, Lee Blankenship, was charged by indictment with aggravated unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of section 24— 1.6(a)(3)(C) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/24 — 1.6(a)(3)(C) (West 2002)). Defendant’s pretrial motions to quash the arrest, suppress evidence, and exclude evidence of prior convictions were denied. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted. Defendant appeals the denial of his pretrial motions, and we affirm.

FACTS

On March 27, 2002, Officer Terry Higgins of the Joliet police department was stopped at a red light behind a green Ford Escort. Though he had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. AtkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. PerezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. State v. DonisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DittmarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. People v. CloseAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. BlankenshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. CloseAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. DittmarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API