Legal Opinion
Yessenow v. Hudson
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 14, 2010No. Cause No. 2:08-CV-353PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW P. RODOVICH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Verified Motion to Compel Discovery [DE 73] filed by the plaintiff, Dr. Jeffrey Yessenow, on December 28, 2009, and on the Motion for Hearing Oral Argument [DE 77] filed by the defendant, Dr. Hilton Hudson, on January 11, 2010. For the following reasons, the Verified Motion to Compel Discovery is GRANTED, and the Motion for Hearing Oral Argument is DENIED.
Background
This motion arises out of a dispute about an indemnity agreement. The plaintiff, Jeffrey Yessenow, and the defendant, Hilton…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Romane J. Rickels v. City of South Bend, Indiana, Fara P. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. Purdue UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Maller v. Chicago Fitness Partners, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- MercAsia USA, LTD v. ZhuDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- OrthoPediatrics Corp. v. Wishbone Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Williams v. Biomet Orthopedics IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019