Legal Opinion
GlobalSantaFe Corp. v. Globalsantafe. Com
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 5, 2003No. CIV.A.01-1541-APublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
GlobalSantaFe Corporation (“GlobalSan-taFe”), the plaintiff in this in rem suit under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”), 1 successfully demonstrated that the domain name <glo-balsantafe.com> infringes its trademark and accordingly obtained a Judgment Order directing Hangang Systems, Inc. (“Hangang”), the registrar of the infringing domain name, to transfer the name to GlobalSantaFe. 2 Yet, because a Korean court enjoined Hangang from transferring the domain name, GlobalSantaFe now seeks a further amendment of the Judgment Order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain NamesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- EMI April Music, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Jefferson v. Briner, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Graduate Management Admission Council v. RajuDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Wing Spot Chicken & Waffles, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Sarrion Travel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.