Legal Opinion
United States of America, in Its Own Right, and for and on Behalf of the Taos Indian Pueblo v. Henry T. Trujillo and Magdalena T. Duran
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1988No. 85-1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Henry T. Trujillo and Magdalena T. Duran (Trujillo and Duran), the son and daughter of Sabino Trujillo, appeal a judgment of the district court requiring them to vacate property belonging to the Taos Pueblo and assessing nominal trespass damages against them because of their innocent trespass. This consolidated action was brought in the district court by the United States on its own behalf, and on behalf of the Taos Pueblo Indians. In an amended answer to the complaint, Trujillo and Duran requested that title be quieted in them as the rightful owners of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dominguez De Guyer v. BanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Edmund v. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1989