Legal Opinion
State v. Gilman
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 31, 1984No. 83-360PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The defendant appeals her conviction for driving while under the influence in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201 (a) (2). We affirm.
The defendant’s first argument on appeal is that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the arresting officer, Roland Daniels, Jr., was certified by the Vermont Criminal Justice Training Council (Council) as a full-time law enforcement officer. The defendant claims that if Mr. Daniels was not properly certified, he was not authorized to arrest the defendant, so that the arrest was illegal and in violation of the defendant’s due process rights.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. HohmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- In Re RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- State v. SenecalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. JewettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.