Legal Opinion

Planning Board v. Serena

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 12, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the defendants’ application for further appellate review, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 689 (1989), to consider their claim that two adjoining lots on Parker Street in Norwell, were “not held in common ownership,” see G. L. c. 40A, § 6, fourth par., first sentence,4 and that as a result they *1009are entitled to two building permits even though the lots do not conform to the current zoning by-law.

The case was submitted on briefs. George M. Ford & Chester A. Janiak for the defendants. Robert L. Marzelli, for Massachusetts City Solicitors & Town Counsel Association, amicus curiae. Fred L. True, Jr.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sorenti v. Board of Appeals of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. PLANNING BOARD OF NORWELL v. SerenaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Preston v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Asack v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Fitch v. Board of Appeals of ConcordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Palitz v. Zoning Board of Appeals of TisburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API