Legal Opinion

PLANNING BOARD OF NORWELL v. Serena

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-P-440PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The Serenas, anticipating Norwell’s adoption four days later of a zoning by-law amendment that would prevent use of their vacant land on Parker Street as two separate building lots fronting thereon, effected a transfer or transfers of title with the intention of securing the grandfather protection of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, fourth par., first sentence (1988 ed.) (making increases in dimensional requirements inapplicable to previously conforming lots held for single or two family residential use where such lots are “not held in common ownership with any adjoining land”). See Adamowicz v. Ipswich,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adamowicz v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Sturges v. Town of ChilmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Arrigo v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Raia v. Board of Appeals of North ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Sorenti v. Board of Appeals of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Preston v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Planning Board v. SerenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Asack v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Fitch v. Board of Appeals of ConcordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API