Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Anderson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1913No. 3916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Larimer District Court. Hon. Neil Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Judge.

On March 24,1911, Harrington, the plaintiff in error, filed his action in the district court to restrain the defendants in error from collecting certain judgments which the latter had obtained against him, basing his action for relief as against said judgments upon the statute of limitations approved April 18, 1891, which statute was set up by plaintiff in his complaint. The defendants each filed general demurrers to the plaintiff’s complaint. The trial court, upon hearing duly had, sustained the demur-rers of the defendants. Plaintiff electing to stand upon his complaint…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Haskel v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Schilling v. RomingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  4. Doe ex dem. Nickles v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Buckmaster v. McElroyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Balfe v. Rumsey & Sikemeier Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. People v. GinglesColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Schniedwind v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  4. Roderick v. HoughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Roderick v. HoughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API