Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bendix Control Division
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1984No. 7022PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), appeals from an order dismissing its amended complaint against Bendix Control Division (Bendix), which sought reimbursement for workmen’s compensation benefits paid to Val Montoya, the involuntary plaintiff.
On appeal, Aetna argues that the trial court erred in dismissing Bendix for lack of in personam jurisdiction. We reverse.
Bendix is a manufacturer of component parts for aircraft. On June 24, 1979, Val Montoya was injured when a helicopter in which he was a passenger, crashed near Gobernador, in Rio Arriba…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Leonard Storch Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Kutner v. DeMassaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Padilla v. Pueblo of AcomaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Visarraga v. Gates Rubber Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Allen v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1984
- Toscano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.