Wells v. . Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentFurches, J.
The plaintiff introduced B. F. Hill, who, together with his brother, W. A. Hill, had administered on the estate of their father (the intestate of plaintiff) in South Carolina, to prove an acknowledgment and new promise by the defendant, as contained in four letters which he and his brother received from the defendant while they, as administrators, were in possession of the note. One of the (901) letters is referred to in the opinion of the Court and copied in full in the dissenting opinion of Associate Justice Furches. The others were dated, respectively, 16 April, 6 May and 27 July, 1891,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greenleaf v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Riggs v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Taylor v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Simonton v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Royster v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Kleis v. McGrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Smith v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Andrus v. IQMax, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008