People v. Avery

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

Feeling aggrieved at a judgment of conviction, based on ten verdicts of guilty, and át his inability to obtain a new trial, the defendant has appealed. He finds fault with the scope of the information and criticizes a ruling on the admission of evidence and the silence of the instructions on three matters. The limits of the defendant’s attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence are fairly presented in these words taken from his closing brief: “The defendant had and has no occasion to challenge the claims that the crimes charged were committed by some man or by several…