Legal Opinion

United States v. Tchibassa

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 21, 2009No. Cr. 91-560-3 (TFH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is defendant Artur Tchibassa’s pro se Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. 1 As explained below, the Court finds no merit in Tchibassa’s claims. Accordingly, a hearing is unnecessary and the Court will deny the motion.

BACKGROUND

Tchibassa was indicted in 1991 for one count of hostage-taking and one count of conspiracy to commit hostage-taking related to events in his native Angola. Arrest ed in 2002 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Tchibassa went to trial in September 2003,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PalmerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. United States v. AguiarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. United States v. PalmerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API