Legal Opinion

Yarnall v. Rowley (In Re Rowley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 30, 1992No. 19-50027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDER K. ECKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the Court is a Complaint to Determine Debtors[’] Obligation to Pay Net Disposable Income Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1225(b). Since 1987, Debtors have made payments according to a confirmed Chapter 12 plan of reorganization and are currently seeking a discharge based upon the allegation that all plan payments have been made. The complaint states that 11 U.S.C. § 1225(b) was properly triggered to require the payment of net disposable income and as a result, there is an obligation to do so even though the plan failed to offer such payments.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In Re Mary E. Johnson, Debtor. Mary E. Johnson v. Vanguard Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Elmer FOBIAN and Elsie Fobian, Debtors. Elmer FOBIAN and Elsie Fobian, Appellants, v. WESTERN FARM CREDIT BANK, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leonard Alfred Rowley and Beverly Ann Rowley v. Rick A. Yarnall, Production Credit Association, and Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Cameron v. Cameron (In Re Cameron)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  3. In Re CorblyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
  4. In Re GageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1993
  5. In Re GrimmUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API