State v. One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars, United States Currency
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
The State filed a complaint for forfeiture of proceeds received from the sale of illegal drugs after convicting claimant Darold Hinsch of possession of a controlled substance. Hinsch filed a claim for this money, which he had previously turned over to government agents. He argued that seizure of the money was improper and that forfeiture, coupled with his conviction, violated his constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The trial court ruled against him on both counts. It is from this ruling that Hinsch appeals. We affirm the trial court’s decision.
BACKGROUND
Agents…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utah Medical Products, Inc. v. SearcyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Division of Unclaimed Property v. McKay Dee Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. 175,800 DOLLARS, US CURRENCYUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999