Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1972No. 44890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is robbery with firearms; the punishment, upon a plea of guilty, twenty (20) years.

Appellant’s court appointed attorney filed a brief in this Court in which he alleges that he has diligently and conscientiously studied the record on appeal and has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and entirely without merit.

In compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S. W.2d 137, counsel has furnished a copy of his brief to appellant and at appellant’s request submits his contention…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API