Legal Opinion

United States v. Norsch

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided June 12, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The right of the United States to sue for the cancellation of a certificate of decree of naturalization that has been obtained by fraud is probably co-extcnsive with the right now accorded the United States to sue for the cancellation of patents that have been fraudulently procured. U. S. v. Telephone Co., 128 U.S. 315, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 90. As no controversy has arisen on this point, I shall assume that the attorney general had the right to file the present bill, even in the absence of any express legislative enactment authorizing such a proceeding. It is contended, however, that the federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Barrow v. HuntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Missouri River Packet Co. v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1880

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. National Surety Co. v. State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Board of Com'rs v. PlattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  5. United States v. SpohrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API