Nicholson v. Wade
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
This action was brought to recover the sum-of $284,300 claimed as the balance of the purchase price of shares of stock sold to defendant under a written contract. Defendant cross-complained against plaintiff and her husband for damages for their fraud in inducing him to enter into the contract. After a trial without a jury the court construed the contract and concluded that defendant was not obligated to pay any further sum thereunder. On the cross-complaint the court found that cross-defendants had willfully made false representations of fact upon which cross-complainant had relied, but that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- County of Los Angeles v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jen-Mar Constr. Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967