Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Wade

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1965No. Civ. No. 27845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

This action was brought to recover the sum-of $284,300 claimed as the balance of the purchase price of shares of stock sold to defendant under a written contract. Defendant cross-complained against plaintiff and her husband for damages for their fraud in inducing him to enter into the contract. After a trial without a jury the court construed the contract and concluded that defendant was not obligated to pay any further sum thereunder. On the cross-complaint the court found that cross-defendants had willfully made false representations of fact upon which cross-complainant had relied, but that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. County of Los Angeles v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jen-Mar Constr. Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API