Legal Opinion
State v. Wilkins
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1975No. 1745PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Both defendants were convicted of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. Section 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, Supp.1973). Their appeal contends: (1) cross-examination of a witness was unduly restricted, (2) there was undue repetition of a witness’s statement, and (3) their sentence was improper.
Cross-Examination
Huckleby testified as a witness for the State. He admitted he was one of the robbers. He implicated the two defendants.(a) Defendants assert the trial court improperly refused to allow them to inquire into Huckleby’s juvenile adjudication and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. BlevinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. RileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. BarrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. BleaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. KendallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. GabaldonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. EllisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.