Legal Opinion

Seeman v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Louis Levine and another, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of March, 1910, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered on the 30th day of October, 1909, in an action upon a third party bond given, in attachment proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J. :

Julius Chill had a grocery store at 771 Amsterdam avenue. On February 4, 1909, plaintiffs brought an action against Chill for goods sold and delivered, obtained a warrant of attachment and made a levy on the stock of groceries and fixtures in said store valued at $390, whereupon the defendant Levine, as claimant of the property, gave the bond herein sued upon the condition being “that if in an action upon this bond, commenced within three months thereafter, said claimant will establish that he was the general owner of the property claimed at the time of the seizing, or if he fails…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Sprintz v. SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Seeman v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huston v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Rugen v. MulvihillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API