Legal Opinion

Seeman v. Levine

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal 'Court of the city' of Hew York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiffs sue upon a bond given by the defendants on a third party claim to goods levied upon under a warrant of attachment, in an action brought by the plaintiffs against one Chill. The evidence established that Chill was indebted to the plaintiffs and to several others; that, on January 27, 1909, Chill transferred the stock and fixtures of a grocery store of which he was the owner to Sakow by a bill of sale, and that, on February 2, 1909, by a bill of sale, Sakow transferred the property to the defendant Levine. It was. also proved that, at the time the plaintiffs caused the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Sprintz v. SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Touris v. KarantzalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Apex Leasing Co. v. LitkeNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Seeman v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API