Legal Opinion
In re Harrison Bros.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1912No. 2,028PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In the matter of Harrison Bros., bankrupts. On certificate for review of order of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
In proceeding on a petition or rule to show cause why certain assets alleged to be concealed by the bankrupt, should not be tinned over to the trustee, testimony was taken before Arthur A. Smith, referee in bankruptcy, to whom the matter had been originally referred.
While examining; on behalf of the trustee, one of the bankrupts,. Benjamin Harrison, his attorneys objected to certain questions directed *321to him. The referee sustained the objection assigning as a reason that:
“The evidence attempted to be adduced having been taken under another proceeding in this case, all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. CorningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1869
- In re RomineDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1905
- The City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1906
- Bank of Ravenswood v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
- In re Wilde's SonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- In re GaylordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- National Cash Register Co. v. CranstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- United States v. LiebermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961