Legal Opinion

United States v. Reed

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1994No. Crim. No. 93-50048-02PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Introduction

Before the Court is defendant GTE Directories Corporation, GTE Directories Sales Corporation, and GTE Directories Service Corporation’s (collectively “GTE”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. GTE moves for partial summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff James W. Wiehoffs (“Wiehoff’) claims of age discrimination and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1985) (“ADEA”)1 are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Background

GTE terminated Wiehoffs employment as a sales…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API