Allegheny Valley School v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentCappy, Justice
I am compelled to dissent. Ultimately, the legal issue to be decided in this appeal is what analytical framework shall be used to determine the propriety of unemployment compensa*367tion benefits in matters where an employee who is demoted because of performance shortcomings leaves his employment. Today, the majority adopts an incomplete and inadequate analytical framework which I believe is contrary to both the language of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)1 and this court’s prior decisions. Unfortunately, the majority rejects the more comprehensive and fair analytical framework recently…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Pittsburgh Pipe & Coupling Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. TuneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.