Legal Opinion
Esser v. Rainbow Advertising Sales Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 13, 2006No. 05 Civ. 3703(WCC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter Esser brings this action against Rainbow Advertising Sales Corp. d/b/a Cablevision Advertising Sales (“RAS-CO”) for interference and retaliation under 29 U.S.C. §§ 2614 and 2615 of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted as to the interference claim and denied as to the retaliation claim.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was employed by RASCO in January 1998 as an Account…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reilly v. Revlon, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Di Giovanna v. Beth Israel Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Brown v. the Pension BoardsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Colon v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Smith v. N. Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Sys.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.