Legal Opinion
Stokes v. Humphries
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 20, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Wilt of error to Circuit Court for Madison County; M. F., Horne, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWi-iitfieed, J.
In an action of replevin for the detention of one mare mule valued at $150.00 and one horse mule valued at $150.00, the plaintiff introduced a retain *469title note for $150.00 “being the purchase price” of the said two mules, and testified that no payments had been made on the note, and that the value of the mare mule was $225.00, and the value of the horse mule was.$75.00.
The verdict for the plaintiff fixed the value of the mare mule at $225.00, and the value of the horse ulule at $75.00. The judgment awarded the two mules to the plaintiff, and also adjudged that the defendant and the sureties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
- McClusky v. TrusselMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Bell v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Roof v. Chattanooga Wood Split Pulley Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southside Atlantic Bank v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Morse Operations, Inc. v. Superior Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Mills Novelty Co. v. TranseauSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Roche v. BarbaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980