Legal Opinion

Kenosha Full Fashioned Mills, Inc. v. Artcraft Hosiery Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 20, 1947No. 5288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Garrett, Presiding Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of tlie court:

The appellant, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, applied to the United States Patent Office for the registration of its trade-mark, “Edgecraft.”

The appellee, hereinafter referred to as the opposer, opposed said registration upon the ground that since its goods and the goods of the applicant were identical (hosiery) there was a likelihood of confusion between the “Edgecraft” trade-mark and its mark, “Artcraft.”

The opposer was senior and the sole question before the tribunals of the Patent Office was whether or not the marks…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. San Francisco Ass'n for Blind v. Industrial Aid for Blind, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Atlantic Seafood Packers v. Florida Fruit Canners, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API