Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Frank R. Gaynor, Judge. Action for separate maintenance. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

This is an unfortunate controversy between husband and wife, which began many years ago, and, as usual, has increased with time until the defendant husband left his home and now is living apart from his wife. Three children were a result of the union. Two are boys, one thirteen and another ten years of age, and the third is a girl seven years old. The marriage was consummated in the year 1888, and defendant was then and is now a telegraph operator — of late years being a train dispatcher. They have not resided long at any one place. When first married they lived a few years at Burlington,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Kimble v. KimbleWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Harlow v. HarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. McMullen v. McMullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shipley v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Norris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Avery v. AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Harlow v. HarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API