Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Saether

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Writ or Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. J. M. O’Connor, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

The argument of plaintiff in error with respect to the contention that the court overruled the demurrer on January 19, 1914, and entered a decree pro confesso against the plaintiff in error, is based upon a misconception of the office and ñmction of a certificate of evidence and the matters which may properly be preserved and shown by the same in a chancery case. The pleadings, motions, orders and the ruling of the chancellor thereon in a chancery case, which are a part of the record proper, have no place in the certificate of evidence and cannot be shown in that way. The function of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hughs v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Wolf v. HopeIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Flaherty v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Fuller v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Keys v. TestIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Piff v. BerresheimIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Miedema v. WormhoudtIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Eager v. BerkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Voris v. McIverIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Burns v. EpsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API