Legal Opinion

Cress v. Heckler

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This is an action brought pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In undertaking this review, we apply the relatively deferential “substantial evidence” standard, Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).

Plaintiff is a fifty-seven (T.R. 44) year old former coal miner (T.R. 48) who was also self-employed as a gas station operator. (T.R. 49). He is a recipient of black lung benefits (T.R. 67) and complains generally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Van Horn, John v. Schweiker, Richard S., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Joseph D. Arnold v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belden v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API