Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Mecom

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1952No. 12388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a plea of privilege case involving the question of a residence for venue purposes apart from the domicile of the, defendant. The leading case (relied upon by both parties) is Snyder v. Pitts, Tex.Sup., 241 S.W.2d 136, decided by the Supreme Court in June, 1951. Other cases (decided by the Court) having a bearing upon the question presented are Kerr v. Davenport, Tex.Civ.App., 233 S.W.2d 197, and Eoff v. Skinner, Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W.2d 991.

H. Mecom is admittedly domiciled in Liberty 'County, Texas. He owns a ranch of about five thousand acres located in Zapata…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kerr v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Eoff v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanslik v. DittfurthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Texas Ethics Commission v. Michael Quinn Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API