Legal Opinion

People v. Rawlinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of three counts of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1], [3]) and one count of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30). The testimony of the victim was not improperly bolstered; rather, the People adduced admissible evidence of her prompt complaints (see, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 16-17; People v Kornowski, 178 AD2d 984, 985, lv denied 89 NY2d 1096; see also, People v Kirkey, 248 AD2d 979, 980, lv denied 92…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. KornowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. KirkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. AybinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SheltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. KeithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. PeckhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. People v. EhrhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API