Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Keel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

This was an action in foreclosure. Decree was entered October 2, 1925, sale had on October 30th following and certificate issued to the plaintiff who had bid in the property for the face of the judgment together with accrued interest and costs. On May 28, 1926, a supplemental complaint was filed, alleging that the 'tenants in possession, lessees, of the mortgagors under a share rental agreement, intended to and would deliver the rent to their landlords instead of the plaintiff certificate holder. The then plaintiff, defendant here, prayed that the tenants be brought into the action as parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orr v. State Board of EqualizationIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. King v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Stoddard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Stuttmeister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sammis v. Marks, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Beeman v. PetrieIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lind v. MoyesIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API