Legal Opinion

Stuttmeister v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1886No. 11527PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application for a writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, J.

This is an application by W. O. Stuttmeister, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of F. W. R. Stuttmeister, deceased, for a writ of certiorari directed to J. V. Coffey, judge of tile Superior Court, Department Nine (probate), in and for the city and county of San Francisco, requiring him to certify to this court for review the record in the matter of the estate referred to.

An alternative writ issued, under which the record is before us, and from which it appears that on the twenty-third day of July, 1885, an order was made by the Superior Court (in probate), requiring the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People ex rel. Field v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Bennett v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Bliss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Slavonic Illyric Mutual Benevolent Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sherman Bros. v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Helbush v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API