Fritsch v. Wohlgemuth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAGEN, Chief Justice.
This appeal raises the question of whether the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare (DPW) acted contrary to law when, pursuant to a departmental regulation, it ordered the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) assistance of a mother and her five minor children terminated because of the failure of the father, with whom they were living, to seek and accept employment. Prior to the department’s action, the family unit had been receiving assistance because of the father’s unemployment. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 607. The father, Francis Fritsch, had been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perillo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Davis v. ReaganDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980