Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Turner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1933No. 24532. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, C. J.

Plaintiff, Louise S. O’Brien (formerly Louise Shoemaker), instituted this action against "William H. Turner and Elizabeth Turner, his wife, and Willapa Lumber Company, a corporation, upon a promissory note dated October 1, 1923, whereby defendant William H. Turner promised to pay, on or before one year after date, to the order of defendant Willapa Lumber Company, the sum of $15,800, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. The note was delivered to plaintiff with the following in-dorsement :

“Portland, Oregon, Oct. 1,1923.
“For value received we hereby guarantee the payment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barto v. NixWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gleason v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hoffman v. Gottstein Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Simonds v. NolandWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. West & Wheeler v. LongtinWashington Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API