Legal Opinion · Dissent

Copp v. Redmond

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1993No. 93-8Published

1DissentCardine, Justice

If this case were resolved by pure application of law only, there can be no question but that the decision would be for the workman by allowing recovery upon proof of negligence in coemployee suits. Unfortunately, courts have never felt constrained by the law if they dislike the result of its application. And so we have here a discussion of legislative intent and reliance upon cases from other jurisdictions, neither of which have any application to this case.

Let us review the historical background of this controversy. The prohibitions upon the limitation of damages and the right to recover…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API