Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. El Rio Water Company
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1966No. 8501PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.
This appeal is by the City of Tucson from a judgment in condemnation awarding the El Rio Water Company, a corporation, the sum of $271,000 as the value of its utility properties. The single issue raised by the City is the propriety of the award insofar as it relates to the going concern value of the utility.
By the Constitution of Arizona, Art. 2, § 17, A.R.S., “just compensation” must be paid for property appropriated; and by statute, subsec. B of A.R.S. § 9-518 (Laws, 1962), the court or jury “shall include the fair and equitable value of [the] plant and property,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Westchester County Park Commission v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kennebec Water District v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
- Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arizona Water Company v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Sende Vista Water Co., Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Kalb v. International Resorts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- City of Scottsdale v. Church of Holy Cross LutheranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Flecha Caida Water Company v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.