Polk v. Polk
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
The question presented on this appeal is whether the sale and assignment of a contract for the purchase of real estate was void as having been made to defraud creditors. This issue was tried out in the court below in garnishment proceedings, and no question is raised concerning the propriety or regularity of these proceedings. The trial court upheld the validity of the assignment and an appeal has been taken by the plaintiff-garnishor, James K. Polk.
For the sake of clarity we shall refer to the garnishor as plaintiff or James, and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baughman v. PennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Gollober v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- McDonald v. GauntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Stephenson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Credit Union of America v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- City of Arkansas City v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Koch Engineering Co. v. FaulconerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Wieczorek v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.