Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Hart

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1925No. 515-4191PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStayton, J.

The disposition of the case is dependent upon the effect, as against Max W. Hart, of a judgment of foreclosure that was had prior to the present litigation. The steps of the former trial and of this last one will be stated in the order of their occurrence.

Robert Lindsey and others brought a suit against persons to whom they had sold some land counting upon the promissory notes given as .part of the consideration and the vendor’s lien retained in the deed for their security. They joined Max W. Hart as a defendant, alleging that their vendees had conveyed the land to him. They prayed recovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stephens v. MotlTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Burson v. BlackleyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SommervilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. UlmerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Middlebrook v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Aloe Vera of America, Inc. v. CIC Cosmetics International Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Rotge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API