Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 25, 1944No. 8224, 8225Published

1DissentJones, Circuit Judge

I should affirm the judgments of the-District Court on the basis of the rule enunciated in Commissioner v. Sansome, 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 931, 933, certiorari denied sub. nom. Sansome v. Burnet, 287 U.S. 667, 53 S.Ct. 291, 77 L.Ed. 575, which I think fits the facts disclosed by the record now before us. While the majority of the Court do. not reject the ruling of the Sansome case,. *183they say that its application should not be extended beyond the precise facts of that case. It does not seem to me, however, that any extended application of the Sansome rule is involved where the additional facts, as in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SansomeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Starr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  4. Georday Enterprises v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Love v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API