Legal Opinion

Ross v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 21, 1982No. 8967-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorbett, J.

Robert C. Pearson appeals (1) the judgment awarding his former wife an undivided one-half interest in disability insurance benefits which were not specifically disposed of in their decree of dissolution, (2) denial of his motion for reconsideration or new trial and motion for leave to reopen, and (3) denial of his CR 60(b)(ll) motion for relief with respect to the decree of dissolution.

The parties were married on October 23, 1953. In the late 1960's, Pearson contracted for disability insurance coverage with Crown Life Insurance Company (Crown), and Safeco Life Insurance Company (Safeco). On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Chase v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Edison Oyster Co. v. Pioneer Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Peste v. PesteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byrne v. AckerlundWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Marriage of SaslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson School District No. 303Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. In Re the Marriage of MudgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Byrne v. AckerlundWashington Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API