Legal Opinion

Schwimmer v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiff, a publicist and lecturer, alleges that the defendants falsely and maliciously incorporated the following in a book published by them: “ I asked W. F. what had been his previous experiences with Ford; for I had noted my subject’s peculiar way of forgetting the enemies he has made, and how he has made them. I succeeded in dredging out of his memory three Henry Ford stories. Two of them have nothing to do with this book, but may serve some future historian with a taste for oddities. The third I think…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Briarcliff Lodge Hotel, Inc. v. Citizen-Sentinel Publishers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Morey v. Morning Journal Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cal-Therm Industries, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. Gunder v. New York Times Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Schwimmer v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API