Legal Opinion

Gunder v. New York Times Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 14, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for an order striking out all of the affirmative defenses in the answer as legally insufficient, and striking out specific paragraphs as irrelevant, etc.

*912 Although opposing the motion on the merits, defendant has challenged the sufficiency of the complaint, and asks that it be dismissed. Both under the state and federal practice, the principle is well settled that a bad answer is good enough for a bad complaint. In Baxter v. McDonnell, 154 N.Y. 432, at page 436, 48 N.E. 816, at page 817, it is stated: “The rule is that, on demurrer to an answer for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Hays v. American Defense Society, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Kloor v. New York Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Lawyers' Co-operative Publishing Co. v. West Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Cheatham v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. Cal-Therm Industries, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API