Legal Opinion
In Re Temple
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided November 8, 2007No. 06-07-00128-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
During the knee replacement surgery performed November 17, 2005, on Robert Christophersen’s right knee, the knee replacement device implanted into the knee was an apparatus designed to be fit into a left knee joint. Christophersen seeks initial pre-suit discovery to determine who to sue.
Christophersen originally sought permission from the trial court to take the oral depositions of several people in anticipation of filing a lawsuit against Samuel Drew Temple, M.D., the orthopedic surgeon at Paris Regional Medical Center and Paris Orthopedic Clinic who…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cantu v. LongoriaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Pilgrim's Pride Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Clapp, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Verticor, Ltd. v. Michael WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Temple, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007