Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Crawford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
Three reasons of appeal are pursued: that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the plea in abatement; that it erred in ruling that mandamus was the proper remedy for the wrong complained of; and that it erred in holding that the statute was valid.
The demurrer to the plea in abatement was properly sustained. The plea does not allege that any or all of the seven hundred and. thirteen other licensees had surrendered their licenses to the county commissioners before this proceeding was instituted; yet by § 2 of the Act the surrender of the license is made a condition precedent to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Town of East Hartford v. HartFord Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Pells v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sanger v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Fitzsimmons v. International Assn. of MacHinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Carroll v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.