Legal Opinion

In re Timothy Eckert

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 20, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01270Unknown

1Opinion

S DIST. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Cis Ric? > WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wS PA a AUG 2 0 2026 In re TIMOTHY ECKERT, LE Sone W y yoeiweR, OSs STERN DISTRICLS® Plaintiff, 25-CV-1270 (JLS) (MJR) DECISION AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Timothy Eckert commenced this “independent action” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3). Dkt. 1. Eckert alleges “fraud on the court” with respect to proceedings in a prior case! and names no other parties.? This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer for all proceedings under

28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Van Buskirk v. The United Group of CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Mikulec v. Town of CheektowagaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API