Legal Opinion

Gilkey v. Gilkey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Bill by Elizabeth R. Gilkey against Clarence F. Gilkey and William H. Bennett, trustee, for a divorce. From a decree for complainant, and making the award of alimony a lien upon the trust, defendant Bennett appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

On January 21, 1910, complainant was granted a decree of divorce with alimony, $4,000 in amount. The decree provided that this sum should be a lien upon certain land held by William H. Bennett as trus*665tee for defendant Clarence Gilkey, said Bennett as trustee having been made a party defendant by leave of court. An appeal was taken by Bennett. The question in the case is whether the court should have made the decree for alimony a lien upon the property in the hands of the trustee.

The history of the trust is as follows: On November 14, 1906, Edgar W. Gilkey, a man in failing health and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hackley v. LittellMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bucknam v. BucknamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Burrage v. BucknamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Roorda v. RoordaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sarah Gilkey Vander Weele, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Frederick Vander WeeleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Vander Weele v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API