Thulemeyer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The appeal from defendant’s first conviction on this transaction will be found in Thulemeyer v. State, 34 Texas Criminal Reports, 619. The present indictment was found after that case was reversed. The charging part of the indictment is set out in the opinion. Ho further statement required.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years; hence this appeal.
The first question presented is as to the validity of the indictment; that is, whether there is repugnance or variance between the purport and tenor clauses thereof. The charging part of said indictment is as follows: That W. L. Thulemeyer “did then and there, without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, did willfully and fraudulently make a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of another, to wit,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cross v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Fite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Gibbons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Mahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Tracy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.