Legal Opinion
Ashenhurst Ex Rel. Hall v. Carey
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 30, 1972No. 72 C 2647PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and on the defendants’ motion for a more definite statement.
This is a civil rights action instituted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Plaintiff requests that a three-judge District Court be convened under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2281 and § 2284 to determine the constitutionality of § 206-5 of Chapter 38 of the Illinois Revised Statutes.
The plaintiff, Martha Ashenhurst, is a minor and a citizen of the United States of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moody v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cheramie v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Keyes v. City of AlbanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Triplett v. AzordeganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Jarosiewicz v. ConliskDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Padover v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.